Information Technology determines contemporary social change. Discuss Essay

Information Technology determines contemporary social change. Discuss giving examples - Essay ExampleIn the current century, we started tapping the celluloid, uranium, electromagnetism, and now the photon. To neutralize hurtful germs, we even employ the services of the bacterium. Another great invention is mathematics, derived naturally from the Homo Sapiens ability to conceive quantity. Spectacular tool making is not realistic without the continuous development of mathematics. Our species has g integrity this far, equipped with only a few pounds of brain matter, a small and frail anatomy, and natural senses limited to a mere five (sight, smell, taste, touch, and hearing).Given these leaps, it has been necessary to come up with a assign of social codes to regulate behavior and ensure continuous order. The law, it is said, operates to regulate behavior and plead the cohesiveness of a given society. In order to maintain its role as bulwark, it capitalizes on and gains credence fro m the idea that on that point is but one set of correct rules and that legal decisions are but logical outcomes of tested principles that are empirically-replicable.Perhaps there are very few modern developments that have represent a challenge to this notion of the law and the legal system than the advent of the earnings. Precisely because of the uniqueness of the medium and the vastness of its breadth, there has been great difficulty solemn regulatory mechanisms on its use - thereby leading, in many cases, to its abuse. There can be no denying that information technology plays an important role in the molding of social values and in the legitimization of personal perceptions. In the United States, 98% have at least one television, 70% have to a greater extent than one television, 70% have cable, and 51% of households with children have a computer. (Paik, 1994)For example, on the have it offs surrounding Internet obscenity, Petrie (1997) found that because the Internet is a uni que communications technology, it does not fit squarely into the conceptual scheme of traditional obscenity law. (p. 638). In a nutshell, the Internet, also called the information superhighway, is a communications network wherein computers from all all over the world may instantaneously communicate and exchange images with each other through the benefit of a modem and an Internet Service Provider. There is no one central source that can filter out images or regulate the flow of information. The internet cannot be shut down at will. On the issue of hate speech, The danger posed by the internet is that more often than not, it is the medium of choice of racial supremacist groups who thrive on the relative safety and untraceability that the Internet provides. Hier (2000) presents three reasonsFirst, there exists a considerable gap between the public images that racial supremacist groups attempt to present in the Internet and a far slight benign image that emerges upon closer analysis second, exemplified by the Freedom-site, the internet has facilitated a greater degree of solidarity between racial supremacist organizations and third, given the impersonal nature of the internet, there exists a certain degree of danger that otherwise ordinary citizens will become more susceptible to the ideology of racial supremacism. (p. 471)The problem is not unless that the technology allows for unprecedented reach and scope. More significantly, the problem is that the law and all its traditional structures are ill-equipped to handle this revolutionary form of